Anyone who talks to me for 5 minutes knows that I am a big believer in the value of choosing a standard for your program and complying with it. Anyone who talks to me for 10 minutes knows that I am especially a fan of NFPA 1600 (National Fire Protection Act 1600). I also see a lot to like in the BCI Good Practice guidelines, IS0 22301, NIST 800, and the FFIEC standards.
However, I’m well aware that many smart BCM managers have made the decision not to adopt a standard for their programs. That’s fine. They’re big boys and girls, and they have their reasons.
This post is written especially for those standard-avoiding managers: you know who you are!
Don’t worry, I’m not going to lecture you on why you really should adopt a standard. I just want to ask you a simple question: Did you really mean to throw the baby out with the bathwater?
What do I mean by that? Well, the bathwater in this case is the use of a standard. And the baby is the systematic gathering of measurements on the performance of your program.
One thing I hear a lot as I travel around the country is people saying, “I don’t need to collect measurements on my program because we are not worrying about complying with any standard.”
Obviously it’s true that one of the main reasons people collect metrics is so they can see where they stack up against their chosen standard. But the fact is there are many other excellent reasons to measure program performance. If you do not gather such metrics because you are under the impression that they have no relevance to you because you are not following a standard, you are depriving yourself of many valuable benefits.
I will lay out some of those benefits in a moment, but first I thought you might find it interesting to hear the main reasons I get from people, as I travel the country, about why they do not gather metrics on their programs. As you will see, these reasons are not always 100% logical, confirming my long-standing observation that the biggest element in business continuity planning is the human element.
The reasons I most often hear from people are:
and finally:
It’s easy to see the flaws in these reasons, or ways of working around them, when you hear them from someone else. I grant you that it’s hard when you are the one enmeshed in that situation.
Anyway, there are many excellent reasons beyond assessing compliance with a standard for a business continuity manager to invest in gathering metrics for their program.
Here are a few ways beyond gauging compliance where programs can benefit by collecting program-performance information:
Are metrics important for determining whether a program is meeting a standard? You bet. But they provide many other valuable benefits besides.
So, you think you have a strong BC program? You’ll never know for sure unless you measure it. Take the guesswork out of the equation with our Compliance Confidence (C2) tool. Part of the BCMMetricsTM suite of business continuity software, this cloud-based self-assessment tool was specifically designed not only to evaluate your business continuity program against multiple major industry standards, but to allow you to gather metrics that put you in control. It’s easy to use and walks you through a set of evaluation questions that you can complete at your own pace. A simple scoring system not only gives you an overall score for your compliance with the business continuity standards; it also provides you with areas of success and opportunities for improvement.
If you’re ready to take your bc program metrics seriously, schedule a free demo of Compliance Confidence (C2) today.