In the 25 years I’ve been in this business, one thing that has changed a lot is our ideas on what makes a good recovery plan. In today’s post, we’re going to run through the key elements of a recovery plan according to the most up-to-date practice and concepts.
In the quarter century that I’ve been working in the field of business continuity, a few things have definitely not changed. Leaders back then were not exactly eager to invest in business continuity and it’s the same today. Many things in our field have changed, however. The majority of these changes have to do with technology, but not all.
An example of a non-technology change is the need to cope with the extreme weather caused by climate change. One area that has seen its fair share of change is our ideas on what constitutes a good recovery plan. In the old days, we had three ideas that now strike me as nuts.
We thought a recovery plan should be written with sufficient detail. So much detail, that if Joe Schmoe off the street got called in to restore the business in an emergency, he would find everything he needed to do so documented in the recovery plan.
We saw the error of ways on this point when we realized the plans being produced were so voluminous, they were almost impossible to use, whether you were Joe Schmoe or a twenty-year veteran of the company.
Another idea we used to have was that it was sufficient to plan to recover from one disaster at a time.
That seems quaint at a time when, as happened to one of our clients last year, it’s possible for a company to be grappling simultaneously with a pandemic, a fire threatening a building of theirs in California, and a hurricane threatening a facility in Florida. The third outmoded idea that was prevalent in the early part of my career was we used to have an all-hazards approach to recovery planning. Nowadays we recognize that what matters is not the nature of the disruption but the nature of the impact, so we keep our recovery planning event neutral. This concludes our tour of memory lane. Let’s move on to the core elements of a good recovery plan, according to the best contemporary practice and concepts.
What are the key elements of a good recovery plan, according to the most up-to-date thinking? In my view, there are five:
Those are the five key strategic elements of writing effective and modern recovery plans according to the best modern thinking. But they aren’t all you need to sort out to write a good plan.
In addition to the main strategic considerations, there are a few critical ancillary elements. Here are the main ones you should think about:
If you don’t give sufficient thought to these ancillary elements, they have a way of making even the most strategically sound plans fall apart.
A lot has changed since I started in business continuity, including our thinking on how to write a modern recovery plan. These days we understand the key strategic elements of writing such plans to be: target the plan to the level of a knowledgeable person, tailor it to fit the culture of the organization, make sure it can handle more than one disruption at a time, provide a moderate level of detail, and make the plan event-neutral. To find out how our ideas about business continuity evolve over the next 25 years, stay tuned.